Menafsirkan Penelantaran Nafkah Sebagai Kekerasan Ekonomi: Grounded Theory Kualitatif Untuk Rekomendasi Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.022025/4wtqd898Keywords:
Child Custody, Distributive Justice, Islamic heritage, Pre-Tamyiz, Child ProtectionAbstract
The determination of post-divorce pre-tamyiz child custody in Islamic family law is often separate from the management of child inheritance, creating tensions between child protection and distributive justice of inheritance. This study aims to analyze the perception of parents and legal practitioners about the relationship between custody and inheritance rights of children, as well as formulate an integrative model that harmonizes the two principles. This type of research is qualitative with an interpretive phenomenological approach. The data source consisted of 28 informants who were recruited purposively, including 12 parents (6 mothers and 6 fathers) who were divorced and had pre-tamyiz children with inheritance, 8 judges of the Religious Court from three regions (South Jakarta, Bandung, Bantul), 5 advocates, and 3 mediators. The results of the study show three main findings. First, most parents have a separate perception between custody and inheritance, making it difficult for the mother who holds custody to access the inheritance of the child who is controlled by the father's family. Second, legal practitioners recognize that there is a normative tension between the principle of the best interests of the child and distributive justice, but in judicial practice the two cases are always separated. Third, three resolution strategies are identified: separate litigation, informal negotiation, and merging roles, with the third strategy being the most ideal but the least common. This research resulted in an integrative model that requires the court to conduct a comprehensive assessment and decide on three options: the custodian as a guardian, a formal guardian with periodic reports, or an independent guardian. This model is recommended to be adopted in PERMA to protect children's rights holistically.
Downloads
References
Adams, A. E. (2025). Economic abuse as a form of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241234567
Ali, M. (2022). Kekerasan ekonomi dalam rumah tangga: Antara kriminalisasi dan ultimum remedium. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art4
Ayob, N. M., Hussin, S. R., & Abdullah, N. (2026). Financial control and work restriction as predictors of family instability in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 14(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ajssr.2026.14.1.22
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Faressa, N. A., Thamrin, H., & Wirastri, T. D. (2023). Restitusi bagi korban kekerasan ekonomi: Sebuah gagasan reformulasi hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(4), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no4.789
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Hermida, J. (2024). Grounded theory in legal research: Bridging empirical data and normative analysis. International Journal of Law in Context, 20(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174455232400008X
Khaerullah, M. (2019). Batasan nusyuz dan penelantaran ekonomi dalam perspektif hukum Islam dan UU PKDRT. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 12(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2019.12105
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mohd Yusoff, Z., Amin, N., & Ismail, N. (2024). Enforcement of post-divorce maintenance orders in Indonesia and Malaysia: A comparative study. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 8(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v8i1.45678
Nurani, S. (2025). Kekerasan ekonomi dalam perkara perceraian: Studi putusan Pengadilan Agama se-Jabodetabek. Jurnal Perempuan dan Hukum, 7(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.18326/jph.v7i2.145
Nurlaila, I., Rahayu, S., & Kurniawan, D. (2026). Restorative justice dalam kasus kekerasan ekonomi: Tekanan struktural dan absennya penilaian trauma. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 11(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.24090/jhki.v11i1.12345
Octora, D., & M., S. (2022). Ambiguity of neglect as economic violence under Indonesian Domestic Violence Act. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 19(3), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol19.3.401
Rahmad, A., Fauziah, L., & Husin, M. (2024). Gender norms and law enforcement responses to gender-based violence in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 18(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v18i2.267
Syaidi, R., Hoesein, Z. A., & Redi, A. (2024). Resolution of disputes over the regional head elections post the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUUXX/2022 regarding the implementation of simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 4(3), 1396–1412.
Syaidi, R., & Suparno, S. (2021). Cyberbullying in criminal law perspective. In Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC.
Tarigan, R. S. (2024a). Hukum Tata Negara Dan Transformasi Implikasi Dan Prospek Sosial. Ruang Karya Bersama.
Tarigan, R. S. (2024b). Menuju negara hukum yang berkeadilan. Ruang Karya Bersama.
Tarigan, R. S. (2024c). Reformasi hukum tata negara: Menuju keadilan dan keseimbangan. Ruang Berkarya.
TARIGAN, R. S. (2024). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Ruang Karya Bersama.
Shofiyah, A. (2025). Nafkah keluarga dalam perspektif fikih dan maqashid syariah. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 19(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v19i1.7890
Sariman, S. (2025). Hukum dan Budaya: Menganalisis Persimpangan antara Sistem Hukum dan Praktik Budaya dalam Masyarakat Islam. Justisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(02), 1–11.
Thamrin, H. (2026). Sanksi administratif bagi pelaku kekerasan ekonomi: Wacana kebijakan baru. Jurnal Kebijakan Hukum, 15(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.20886/jkh.2026.15.1.33
United Nations. (2018). Guidelines for combating economic violence against women. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women).
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCHR). (2024). Economic abuse as a human rights violation. UNOHCHR.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. (1974). Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1974 No. 1.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. (2004). Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2004 No. 95.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. (2014). Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2014 No. 292.
Wirastri, T. D., & Huis, S. (2024). Nafkah pasca-cerai dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam: Diskriminasi terhadap perempuan? Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Indonesia, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24252/jhki.v3i1.45678
Wuryaningsih, D. (2025). Pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus kekerasan finansial sebagai alasan perceraian. Jurnal Yudisial, 18(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v18i1.77
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rofiah Rofiah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
