Kontradiksi Norma dan Kepastian Hukum: Analisis Penetapan Wali Nikah antara UU Perkawinan, KHI, dan Praktik di Pengadilan Agama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.022025/gjdxz464Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Normative Contradictions, Religious Courts, Marriage GuardianshipAbstract
Marriage guardian is the pillar that determines the validity of the marriage contract, but its regulation in Law Number 1 of 1974, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Regulation of the Minister of Religion Number 11 of 2007 contains normative contradictions that have an impact on legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the contradictions of these norms, identify the judge's reasoning patterns in resolving them, and evaluate their implications for legal certainty. This research is a normative-empirical legal research with a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach. The data source consists of primary data in the form of Religious Court decisions on the determination of guardians and interviews with five judges of the Religious Court, clerks, and employees of the Office of Religious Affairs; and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, jurisprudence, books, and articles from reputable journals. Data collection was carried out through document studies, semi-structured interviews, and literature studies. Data analysis used the interactive analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña through data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing and verification. Data validity was ensured through triangulation of sources and techniques, member checking, trail audits, and transparent documentation of the analysis process. The results of the study showed three main findings. First, there are three points of normative contradiction: the age requirement of guardians, the procedure for determining guardian adhal, and the definition of guardian judges. Second, judges develop three reasoning patterns: textual, substantive-contextual, and integrative legalism. Third, normative contradictions create substantial, procedural, and institutional uncertainty. This study recommends harmonization of norms through the codification of guardian age requirements, the preparation of guidelines for the interpretation of sharia reason criteria, and the strengthening of the voluntary examination mechanism that continues to listen to guardians.
Downloads
References
Dermawan, M. D., Kurniat, & Mustafa, Z. (2026). Eksistensi wali adhal pada perkawinan mempelai wanita perspektif hukum Islam. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam, 4(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i5.10334
Eko, H., Suprihatiningsih, S., Kurniawan Rangkuti, R., & Sariman, S. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif . Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia.
Maghfiroh, N., & Raden Roro, F. S. (2026). Batas alasan syar'i dalam penolakan wali nikah: Analisis putusan wali ‘adhal di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 7(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v7i2.3346
Mazidah, D. A., & Izzuddin, A. (2023). Penetapan wali adhal dengan alasan tidak sekufu Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Gresik Tahun 2020-2021 perspektif maqasid syariah. SAKINA: Journal of Family Studies, 7(1), 82–95.
Rozi, M. F., Maskuri, M., Ghoni, D., Madyan, S., Sariman, S., & Haryono, E. (2026). Multicultural Islamic Education Model Based on Salaf Tradition in Islamic Boarding School. ASEAN Journal of Religion, Education, and Society, 5(2), 81–88.
Sariman, S. (2025). Hukum dan Budaya: Menganalisis Persimpangan antara Sistem Hukum dan Praktik Budaya dalam Masyarakat Islam. Justisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(02), 1–11.
Sariman, S., Musfa’ah, U. R., Hasanah, E. U., & Afandi, B. (2026). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Berbasis Tradisi Kepesantrenan. In Meta Nusantara. Meta Nusantara.
Syaidi, R. T. (2024). Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak. In Historie Media. Historie Media.
Syaidi, R. T. (2025). The Constitution as a Living Constitution: Dynamic S of Interpretation in The Indonesia Legal System. Law and Economics, 19(3), 249–257. https://journals.ristek.or.id/index.php/LE/article/view/230
Syaidi, R. T. (2025). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. In Amerta Media (Vol. 11, Number 1). Amerta Media.
Sriono. (2023). Hukum perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.
Radbruch, G. (2006). Rechtsphilosophie (S. L. Paulson & R. D. Dreier, Eds.). Mohr Siebeck.
Kelsen, H. (2006). General theory of law and state (A. Wedberg, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Karya asli diterbitkan 1945)
Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Teori hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Rhiti, H. (2013). Kepastian hukum. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nurlaelawati, E. (2018). Modernization, tradition, and identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and legal practice in the Indonesian religious courts. Amsterdam University Press.
Bowen, J. R. (2020). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Cammack, M., & Feener, R. M. (2019). Islamic law in contemporary Indonesia: Ideas and institutions. Harvard University Press.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 11 Tahun 2007 tentang Pencatatan Nikah.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 30 Tahun 2005 tentang Wali Hakim.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Cianjur Nomor 67/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Clg.
Penetapan Pengadilan Agama Nomor 89/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Tmq.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zainudin Zainudin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
