Multisensory-Based Science Instruction in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Review of Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Outcomes

Authors

  • Damar Septian STAI Pati Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.010125/r2kc3t86

Keywords:

Cognitive Outcomes, Elementary Schools, Multisensory-Based Science Instruction, Psychomotor Outcomes, Systematic Review

Abstract

This systematic review aims to analyze and synthesize empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of multisensory-based science instruction in elementary schools across three domains of learning outcomes: cognitive (conceptual understanding, critical thinking), affective (motivation, attitudes, emotional engagement), and psychomotor (manipulative skills, sensorimotor coordination). This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in the Scopus database with a publication range of 2015–2025. A total of 42 empirical research articles meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed in this review. The analysis indicates that multisensory-based science instruction consistently yields positive impacts across all three outcome domains. In the cognitive domain, multisensory approaches enhance conceptual understanding, memory retention, and critical thinking skills through the integration of visual, auditory, and tactile-kinesthetic input. In the affective domain, multisensory instruction increases learning motivation, positive attitudes toward science, and emotional regulation. In the psychomotor domain, multisensory interventions develop manipulative skills, coordination, and proprioceptive awareness. This review also identifies various multisensory learning technologies and media implemented, including augmented reality, serious games, and haptic interfaces. Multisensory-based science instruction is an effective approach for developing students' holistic competencies in elementary schools. These findings have important implications for curriculum development, instructional design, and science education policy at the elementary level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adolphs, R. (2002). Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(1), 21–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582302001001003

Agostini, D. (2018). Exploiting the best sensory modality for learning arithmetic and geometrical concepts based on multisensory interactive Information and Communication Technologies and serious games. CORDIS. CORDIS | European Commission. https://doi.org/10.3030/732391

Ainia, V. M., Mulyani, M., Zuhdi, U., Muhimmah, H. A., & Setiawan, R. (2025). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran berbasis neurosains sintaks hypnohappy terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VI sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 13(1), 107–121.

Andrä, C., Mathias, B., Schwager, A., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2020). Learning Foreign Language Vocabulary with Gestures and Pictures Enhances Vocabulary Memory for Several Months Post-Learning in Eight-Year-Old School Children. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 815–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09527-z

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

Beer, J. S., John, O. P., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. T. (2006). Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: Integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(6), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.871

Benedictus, M. R., Spikman, J. M., & van der Naalt, J. (2010). Cognitive and behavioral impairment in traumatic brain injury related to outcome and return to work. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9), 1436–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.019

Blair, R. J. R. (2003). Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1220

Cannon, W. B., & Cattell, M. (1916). Studies on the conditions of activity in endocrine glands. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 41(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1916.41.1.74

Colucci-Gray, L., Hancock, J., Islam, R., Sharma, N., Manches, A., Bowers, L., Lakeman-Fraser, P., Mozier, S., Newman, J., Reuger, S., & Siddharthan, A. (2024, May). Seeing with hands and touching with eyes: Recovering sensorial attention to nature in primary schools. First International Conference on Embodied Education. https://conferences.au.dk/embodied-education2024

Cuya, C. M., Barriga, C., Graf, M. del C., Cardeña, M., Borja, M. del P., Condori, R., Azocar, M., & Cuya, C. (2024). Multisensory stimulation and its effect on breast milk volume production in mothers of premature infants. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1331310

Durbeej, N., Alm, C., & Gumpert, C. H. (2014). Perceptions of treatment among offenders with mental health problems and problematic substance use: The possible relevance of psychopathic personality traits. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 4(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2014.41012

Flanigan, R. L. (2025). Sensory rooms enable students to de-stress, refocus. New York State School Boards Association.

Fried, I., MacDonald, K. A., & Wilson, C. L. (1997). Single neuron activity in human hippocampus and amygdala during recognition of faces and objects. Neuron, 18(5), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80315-3

Gori, M., Price, S., Newell, F. N., Berthouze, N., & Volpe, G. (2022). Multisensory perception and learning: Linking pedagogy, psychophysics, and human–computer interaction. Multisensory Research, 35(4), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10072

Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants (1st ed.). (1st ed.). Milkweed Editions. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3371572

Klüver, H., & Bucy, P. C. (1997). Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. 1939. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 9(4), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.9.4.606

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155

Leonard, C. M., Rolls, E. T., Wilson, F. A., & Baylis, G. C. (1985). Neurons in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Behavioural Brain Research, 15(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(85)90062-2

MacLEAN, P. D. (1949). Psychosomatic disease and the visceral brain; recent developments bearing on the Papez theory of emotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 11(6), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-194911000-00003

Mathias, B., Andrä, C., Schwager, A., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2022). Twelve- and Fourteen-Year-Old School Children Differentially Benefit from Sensorimotor- and Multisensory-Enriched Vocabulary Training. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1739–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09648-z

Melhem, D. Z., Zoubi, A. M. A., Al-Shannaq, M. M., Raiyan, A. S. H., & Melhem, H. (2025). Improving Geometric Thinking Skills Through a Multisensory-Based CRA Framework in Students with Learning Difficulties and Various Sensory Preferences. Educational Process: International Journal. https://edupij.com/index/arsiv/77/626/improving-geometric-thinking-skills-through-a-multisensory-based-cra-framework-in-students-with-learning-difficulties-and-various-sensory-preferences

Moral-Pérez, M. E., Fernández-García, L. C., & Guzmán-Duque, A. P. (2015). Videogames: Multisensory incentives boosting multiple intelligences in primary education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(2).

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Paterson, M. (2020). The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087168

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

Setyawan, B., Rufi’i, R., & Fatirul, Ach. N. (2019). AUGMENTED REALITY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA BAGI SISWA SD. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v7n1.p78--90

Shen, G., Wang, R., Yang, M., & Xie, J. (2022). Chinese Children with Congenital and Acquired Blindness Represent Concrete Concepts in Vertical Space through Tactile Perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11055. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711055

Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses (pp. xv, 211). The MIT Press.

Trout, S. A. (2025). Effects of Multi-Sensory Training in Physical Activity on Reaction Time and Fitness in Elementary Students. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5927

Tsushima, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Roles of attention in perceptual learning from perspectives of psychophysics and animal learning. Learning & Behavior, 37(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.2.126

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

Zimmermann, P., Mohr, C., & Spangler, G. (2009). Genetic and attachment influences on adolescents’ regulation of autonomy and aggressiveness. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 50(11), 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02158.x

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Multisensory-Based Science Instruction in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Review of Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Outcomes. (2026). PEDAGOGIA : JURNAL KEGURUAN DAN PENDIDIKAN, 2(02), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.010125/r2kc3t86