Deep Learning-Based Adaptive Learning System Innovation for Facilitating Diverse Curiosity in Upper Elementary Student

Authors

  • Nor Lailatul Khoiriyah Khoiriyah STAI Pati Author
  • Nur Afiatul Ulya Author
  • Nia Istiani Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.010125/m3v5ah92

Keywords:

Deep learning, adaptive learning Systems, curiosity, upper elementary education, systematic literature review, curiosity-driven learning

Abstract

The cultivation of curiosity in upper elementary education represents a critical yet underexplored frontier for deep learning-based adaptive systems. While deep learning has revolutionized knowledge tracing and personalized learning pathways, the systematic integration of curiosity as a multidimensional construct into adaptive system architectures remains largely absent from the scholarly literature. This systematic literature review examines the extant research landscape at the intersection of deep learning-based adaptive learning systems and curiosity facilitation for upper elementary students (Grades 4–6). Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases yielded 1,847 initial records, from which 47 empirical studies met rigorous inclusion criteria. The findings reveal three critical research gaps: (1) the predominant focus on knowledge state modeling in deep knowledge tracing systems to the exclusion of epistemic curiosity constructs; (2) the absence of validated curiosity-aware student modeling architectures capable of distinguishing between and responding to diverse curiosity subtypes; and (3) the lack of pedagogical frameworks that operationalize curiosity-driven learning mechanisms within deep learning-based adaptive system designs. The review culminates in a proposed Curiosity-Informed Adaptive Deep Learning (CIADL) Framework, representing the first integrative model that systematically maps the theoretical, measurement, architectural, and pedagogical dimensions necessary for designing adaptive systems that foster, rather than merely accommodate, student curiosity. This framework establishes a novel research agenda for educational technology, with significant implications for the design of developmentally appropriate adaptive learning environments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badran, Y., & Preisach, C. (2025). Representation learning of auxiliary concepts for improved student modeling and exercise recommendation. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2508.16269.

Clément, B., Sauzéon, H., Roy, D., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2024). Improved performances and motivation in intelligent tutoring systems: Combining machine learning and learner choice. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2402.01669.

Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60.

Falah, A. (2025). Penerapan Penggunaan Media Digital Dalam Menumbuhkan Kesadaran Budaya Baca Siswa. Https://Journal.Metanusantara.Com/Pedagogia/Index.Php/Jkp, 2(01), 28–34.

Faricha, F., & Sariman, S. (2024). Peran Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Pada Dalam Membentuk Generasi Muslim Yang Kompetitif. Al Fattah Ejournal Sma Al Muhammad Cepu, 5(02), 36–57.

Fatoni, I. (2024). Transformasi Pendidikan Melalui Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar: Studi Tren Model Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dan Madrasah. Https://Journal.Metanusantara.Com/Pedagogia/Index.Php/Jkp, 1(01), 27–36.

Guo, J., Ma, Y., Jang, H.-R., Li, T., Wu, J., Huang, D., & Wang, F. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on primary school students‘ motivation and engagement: A systematic review. OSF Preprints.

Han, R., Chen, K., & Tan, C. (2019). Curiosity-driven recommendation strategy for adaptive learning via deep reinforcement learning. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.

Jirout, J. J., Vitiello, V. E., & Zumbrunn, S. K. (2024). Curiosity in schools: A systematic review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 45-78.

Karachristos, C., Stamelos, I., & Verykios, V. S. (2026). AI-driven adaptive and personalized learning systems: A systematic review of adaptation mechanisms and learner modelling. INTED2026 Proceedings, 348-362.

Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2026). Faces and phases of epistemic curiosity in science learning: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 1-25.

Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585-1595.

Maher, M. L., Latif, E., & Zhai, X. (2024). Exploring AI-based computational models of novelty to encourage curiosity in student learning. SN Computer Science, 5, Article 559.

Manasik Jauharul, S.-S. (2025). Determinansi Kinerja Guru: Sintesis Literatur Terhadap Variabel Kompensasi, Loyalitas, dan Faktor Psikologis Kerja. Genius: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(02), 12–25.

Habibah, N. (2025). Implementasi Pola Asuh Positif dan Implikasinya terhadap Perkembangan Sosial Emosional Anak Usia Dini di Lembaga PAUD. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(1), 610250.

Hana, Y. (2025). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Https://Journal.Metanusantara.Com/Pedagogia/Index.Php/Jkp, 2(01), 35–43.

Haryono, E., Rangkuti, Rizki Kurniawan, Sariman, S., & Suprihatiningsih, S. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif . Https://Www.Rcipress.Rcipublisher.Org/Index.Php/Rcipress/Catalog/Book/949. Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia.

Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Kaplan, F. (2007). What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 1, Article 6.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L. J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015). Deep knowledge tracing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 505-513.

Prenevost, M. H., Ford, E., FitzGibbon, L., & Bazhydai, M. (2026). Mapping curiosity in school-age children: Taxonomy, tasks, and preliminary findings. Poster presented at the Cognitive Development Society Conference, Montreal, Canada.

Roy, D., Sauzéon, H., Clément, B., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2024). Improved performances and motivation in intelligent tutoring systems: Combining machine learning and learner choice. HAL Open Science, hal-04889350.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Sari, K. P. (2025). Konsep deep learning sebagai pilar dalam strategi pendidikan berkualitas. Pedagogia: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Pendidikan, 1(02), 11–19.

Sariman, S., Huda, C., & Afif, M. N. (2021). Pengembangan Mutu Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran: Implementasi Profesionalisme Guru Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 6(2), 317–341.

Sariman, S., & Mutaqien, F. Z. (2025). Intervensi Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Mengurangi Kecemasan Asesmen di Kalangan Santri Pesantren. Al Fattah Ejournal Sma Al Muhammad Cepu, 6(01), 21–30.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education: A systematic review of techniques for personalized learning. Discover Education, 4, Article 458.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Deep Learning-Based Adaptive Learning System Innovation for Facilitating Diverse Curiosity in Upper Elementary Student. (2026). PEDAGOGIA : JURNAL KEGURUAN DAN PENDIDIKAN, 2(02), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.010125/m3v5ah92